Bradley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bradley v. State

34 S.W.3d 297, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1915, 2000 WL 1877866

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2000·No. No. WD 58245·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester Bradley appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Bradley sought to vacate his convictions for one count of first degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, RSMo 1994, and two counts of second degree child molestation, section 566.068, RSMo 1994, and sentences of 15 years imprisonment on the statutory sodomy count and concurrent one year sentences on each of the child molestation counts. He claims that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily’entered because plea counsel failed to clearly communicate the state’s plea bargain offer. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester Bradley appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Bradley sought to vacate his convictions for one count of first degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, RSMo 1994, and two counts of second degree child molestation, section 566.068, RSMo 1994, and sentences of 15 years imprisonment on the statutory sodomy count and concurrent one year sentences on each of the child molestation counts. He claims that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily’entered because plea counsel failed to clearly communicate the state’s plea bargain offer. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Bradley v. State, 34 S.W.3d 297, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1915, 2000 WL 1877866 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

34 S.W.3d 297 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.