Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bradley v. State

Bradley v. State

148 S.E. 423, 39 Ga. App. 697, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 524
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1929
Docket19663
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 423 (Bradley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. State, 148 S.E. 423, 39 Ga. App. 697, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 524 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Broyles, G. J.

1. Although (as admitted in the brief of the solicitor-general) the indictment in this case, which charged the offense of perjury, was “grammatically and rhetorically defective,” it was sufficient to withstand the demurrer interposed, and the overruling of the demurrer was not error.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court properly overruled the motion for a new trial, which contained the usual general grounds only. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Rosser & Shaw, for plaintiff in error. M. Neil Andrews, soliciior-general, Dean Owens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pope v. State
158 S.E. 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 423, 39 Ga. App. 697, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-state-gactapp-1929.