Bradley v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bradley v. State

179 S.E. 343, 180 Ga. 478, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 449

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 15, 1935·No. No. 10427·Published

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

1. When considered with the counter-showing, the alleged newly discovered evidence was not such as would likely produce a different result upon another trial. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

2. There is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, G. J., and Alkmson, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

1. When considered with the counter-showing, the alleged newly discovered evidence was not such as would likely produce a different result upon another trial. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

2. There is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, G. J., and Alkmson, J., who dissent.

Bradley v. State, 179 S.E. 343, 180 Ga. 478, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 449 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

179 S.E. 343 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.