Bradley v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bradley v. State

179 S.E. 343, 180 Ga. 478, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 449

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

DocketNo. 10427

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 343 (Bradley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradley v. State, 179 S.E. 343, 180 Ga. 478, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 449 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

1. When considered with the counter-showing, the alleged newly discovered evidence was not such as would likely produce a different result upon another trial. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

2. There is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, G. J., and Alkmson, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

1. When considered with the counter-showing, the alleged newly discovered evidence was not such as would likely produce a different result upon another trial. The court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.

2. There is no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, G. J., and Alkmson, J., who dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E. 343, 180 Ga. 478, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-state-ga-1935.