Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bradley v. State

Bradley v. State

849 So. 2d 1124, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10199, 2003 WL 21537475
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-4243
StatusPublished

This text of 849 So. 2d 1124 (Bradley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. State, 849 So. 2d 1124, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10199, 2003 WL 21537475 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice for Bradley to file a legally sufficient motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida [1125]*1125Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 raising any issue concerning jail credit, see Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(adopting strict pleading requirement imposed by Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998);) and, to file any appropriate extraordinary relief, if necessary, upon the Department of Corrections determination under sections 944.28(c) and 944.279, Florida Statutes.

GUNTHER, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
849 So. 2d 1124, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10199, 2003 WL 21537475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.