Bradley v. State

849 So. 2d 1124, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10199, 2003 WL 21537475
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bradley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 918 So. 2d 337
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 2003·No. No. 4D02-4243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice for Bradley to file a legally sufficient motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida [1125]*1125Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 raising any issue concerning jail credit, see Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(adopting strict pleading requirement imposed by Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998);) and, to file any appropriate extraordinary relief, if necessary, upon the Department of Corrections determination under sections 944.28(c) and 944.279, Florida Statutes.

GUNTHER, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley v. State, 849 So. 2d 1124, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10199, 2003 WL 21537475 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

849 So. 2d 1124 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)