Bradley v. State
725 So. 2d 1276, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1466, 1999 WL 72581
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bradley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 703 So. 2d 1176 →
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to file a rule 3.800(a) motion that complies with the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998) (3.800 motion must affirmatively allege that the court records demonstrate on their face entitlement to relief), and Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (allegations required by Mancino at a minimum must address how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradley v. State, 725 So. 2d 1276, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1466, 1999 WL 72581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
725 So. 2d 1276 (Bradley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)