Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad
241 U.S. 639, 36 S. Ct. 285, 60 L. Ed. 1215, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1369
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 344; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150; Moore-Mansfield Co. v. Electrical Co., 234 U. S. 619; Willoughby v. Chicago, 235 U. S. 45.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad, 241 U.S. 639, 36 S. Ct. 285, 60 L. Ed. 1215, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1369 (1916).
241 U.S. 639 (Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana
185 U.S. 336 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Ross v. Oregon
227 U.S. 150 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. Electrical Installation Co.
234 U.S. 619 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Willoughby v. City of Chicago
235 U.S. 45 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Parker v. McLain
237 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1915)