Bradley v. . Souther

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bradley v. . Souther

12 N.C. 427

DecidedJune 5, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 12 N.C. 427 (Bradley v. . Souther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradley v. . Souther, 12 N.C. 427 (N.C. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

We think it is irregular and erroneous to vacate a-grant, without making the patentee a party, if tic is Jiving, or his heirs if lie is dead, and that an allegation of the patentee having assigned all his rights under the grant, will not dispense with the necessity of making him a party.

Let the judgment be reversed. *

*

Another case at the instance of the same Plaintiff, was decided upon precisely the same grounds.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

We think it is irregular and erroneous to vacate a-grant, without making the patentee a party, if tic is Jiving, or his heirs if lie is dead, and that an allegation of the patentee having assigned all his rights under the grant, will not dispense with the necessity of making him a party.

Let the judgment be reversed. *

*

Another case at the instance of the same Plaintiff, was decided upon precisely the same grounds.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 N.C. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-souther-nc-1828.