Bradley v. Roe
257 A.D. 1074, 14 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bradley v. Roe. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 A.D. 1005 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1939·Published
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 1005.] The following questions are certified: 1. Should summary judgment have been granted in favor of plaintiff? 2. Should defendants’ motion for summary judgment have been granted? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradley v. Roe, 257 A.D. 1074, 14 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
257 A.D. 1074 (Bradley v. Roe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.