Bradley v. Powles
221 A.2d 223, 47 N.J. 422
This text of 221 A.2d 223 (Bradley v. Powles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bradley v. Powles, 221 A.2d 223, 47 N.J. 422 (N.J. 1966).
Opinion
EMMA BRADLEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HARRY POWLES, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Lieberman, Gorrin, Connors & Ironson, for the petitioner.
Messrs. Marcus & Levy and Mr. John Selawsky, for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lawrence R. McCoy Co., Inc. v. SS" THEOMITOR III"
336 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
221 A.2d 223, 47 N.J. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-powles-nj-1966.