Bradley v. Powles
221 A.2d 223, 47 N.J. 422
Opinion
EMMA BRADLEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HARRY POWLES, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Lieberman, Gorrin, Connors & Ironson, for the petitioner.
Messrs. Marcus & Levy and Mr. John Selawsky, for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradley v. Powles, 221 A.2d 223, 47 N.J. 422 (N.J. 1966).
221 A.2d 223 (Bradley v. Powles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lawrence R. McCoy Co., Inc. v. SS" THEOMITOR III"
336 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)