Bradley v. North Carolina Department of Corrections

141 F. App'x 160
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 16, 2005·No. No. 05-6105·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Opleton Bradley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bradley v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-44-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley v. North Carolina Department of Corrections, 141 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2005).

141 F. App'x 160 (Bradley v. North Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related