Bradley v. Mission St. Joseph's Health System

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedOctober 4, 2005
DocketI.C. NO. 133260.
StatusPublished

This text of Bradley v. Mission St. Joseph's Health System (Bradley v. Mission St. Joseph's Health System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. Mission St. Joseph's Health System, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2005).

Opinions

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are subject to and bound by the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer on 27 January 2001.

3. Plaintiff sustained a compensable injury by accident on 27 January 2001 when she was assaulted by a combative patient.

4. Plaintiff came under the care of Dr. Eric L. Rhoton, a neurosurgeon. On 20 March 2001, Dr. Rhoton performed a left T8-9 diskectomy on plaintiff, who was out of work from 11 March 2001 until she returned to work on 19 November 2001. From 12 April 2001 until 19 November 2001, plaintiff received temporary total disability benefits at a rate of $585.83 per week.

5. The parties further stipulated to the following: (a) plaintiff's medical records; (b) Industrial Commission forms; (c) discovery responses; (d) miscellaneous correspondence; and (e) check stubs.

6. Following the hearing before the deputy commissioner the depositions and medical records of Dr. Eric L. Rhoton; Dr. Brison O. Robertson; Dr. Jeffrey R. Coston; Karen Grogan, RN; and Roger Mead, PT were submitted and received into evidence.

***********
Based on the foregoing stipulations and the evidence presented, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing before the deputy commissioner, plaintiff was a 53-year old female with a bachelor's degree in nursing. Plaintiff had been a nurse for approximately 25 years. Plaintiff was hired to work as a nurse with defendant-employer on June 23, 1997. Plaintiff had previously worked for defendant as a nurse, and in total worked for defendant as a nurse for approximately ten years.

2. On January 27, 2001, plaintiff was performing her duties as a nurse in defendant's emergency room. In the performance of her duties, plaintiff was asked to help start an I.V. on a patient.

3. The patient weighed between 250 and 300 lbs. and was agitated and combative. The patient assaulted plaintiff, striking her at least three times about the face, neck, back, head and shoulders, resulting in plaintiff falling to the floor.

4. Frank Luther, a certified nursing assistant and Walt Ingle, a security guard came to plaintiff's assistance.

5. Plaintiff reported the assault and injuries to her charge/managing nurse, Glenda Sanderson, RN, who completed an "Employee Occurrence Report" on January 27, 2001. Mr. Luther and Mr. Ingle were listed as "eyewitnesses" to the assault. Another incident report was completed by the Security Department on January 27, 2001, all of which described the assault on plaintiff.

6. A January 27, 2001 "Work Status Summary" was prepared which noted that plaintiff was starting an I.V. on a combative patient and that there were three security officers present who pulled the patient off plaintiff after she had been struck three times about the head.

7. One of the other nurses on duty in the emergency room at the time of the assault, Rita Moss, RN, did not witness the attack, but testified that she viewed the redness to the back of plaintiff's neck immediately after the assault.

8. After the incident on January 27, 2001 plaintiff spoke with Dr. Hunt, an emergency room physician on duty who gave her samples of a muscle relaxant, Flexeril. Plaintiff completed her shift. Following January 27, 2001, plaintiff continued to work for defendant and did not complain to her supervisor.

9. However, because plaintiff continued to experience pain, discomfort and incontinence, she sought medical treatment. Plaintiff did not notify her employer that she was seeking medical treatment with her family physician, Brison Robertson, M.D. on March 9, 2001. Based upon Dr. Robertson's examination of plaintiff, an MRI of her lumbar and thoracic spine was ordered. Dr. Robertson then referred plaintiff to Eric L. Rhoton, M.D., a board-certified neurosurgeon.

10. On March 16, 2001 Dr. Rhoton diagnosed plaintiff with central and left-sided T8-9 herniated nucleus pulposus with associated thoracic myelopathy, neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction, degenerative lumbar scoliosis with associated lumbar spinal stenosis at L4-5, severe latex allergy and pruritus with morphine, excessive sedation and decreased level of consciousness with Demerol in the past. Dr. Rhoton recommended surgical decompression of plaintiff's thoracic disc herniation with associated cord compression and stated that in his opinion, the disc herniation was work-related.

11. Also, on March 16, 2001 plaintiff first spoke with her immediate supervisor about the recommended thoracic surgery already scheduled four days later and the causal relationship between her work-related assault and her need for surgery. Since plaintiff had continued working full time and had not informed defendant of any related problems, this was the first notice that defendant received that there were any lingering injuries as a result of the January 27, 2001 incident and the first notice this complaint required medical assistance. Further, since defendant did not have copies of plaintiff's medical records nor had they an opportunity to review these records, she was advised to apply for Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) benefits for her time out of work. In addition, due to concern about the interaction of workers' compensation benefits and FMLA benefits, plaintiff was directed to defendant's workers' compensation administrator, Mary Silver, who advised plaintiff to file her expenses for her surgery scheduled four days later with plaintiff's health insurance carrier until medical reports could be obtained and reviewed and a determination could be made regarding workers' compensation.

12. Plaintiff was admitted to the hospital March 20, 2001, had surgical repair of T8-T9, and was discharged March 22, 2001. On March 25, 2001, just three days after her surgical discharge, plaintiff returned to the emergency room because of fever, nausea, fatigue, back pain and numbness and weakness in her legs.

13. On March 28, 2001, plaintiff provided defendant with a recorded statement detailing the origin, nature and extent of her injuries from the January 27, 2001 assault.

14. Plaintiff returned to the emergency room again on April 9, 2001 for fever and chills.

15. Defendant filed a Form 61 dated April 18, 2001, denying plaintiff's workers' compensation claim in order to obtain plaintiff's medical records including the operative report in order to determine whether her current problem was work-related.

16. Subsequently defendant filed a Form 63 dated May 7, 2001, commencing payment of temporary total disability benefits to plaintiff without prejudice as of April 12, 2001, even though plaintiff had been unable to work since March 11, 2001.

17. Plaintiff filed a Form 18 Notice of Accident with the Industrial Commission on May 17, 2001.

18. Plaintiff's first check covering the period April 12, 2001 through May 11, 2001 in the amount of $2,510.70 was issued by defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shah v. Howard Johnson
535 S.E.2d 577 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Troutman v. White & Simpson, Inc.
464 S.E.2d 481 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
Estes v. North Carolina State University
401 S.E.2d 384 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bradley v. Mission St. Joseph's Health System, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-mission-st-josephs-health-system-ncworkcompcom-2005.