Bradley v. McKee
3 F. Cas. 1156, 5 Cranch 298
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided March 15, 1837·Published·Cited by 18 cases
Opinion
Verdict for defendant. The plaintiff took bills of exception, but has not prosecuted a writ of error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradley v. McKee, 3 F. Cas. 1156, 5 Cranch 298 (circtddc 1837).
3 F. Cas. 1156 (Bradley v. McKee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Best v. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank
141 S.W. 334 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Snead v. Scheble
175 F. 570 (Sixth Circuit, 1909)
Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.
1900 OK 4 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1900)
Baldwin v. Buswell
52 Vt. 57 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1879)
Mosselman v. Caen
4 Thomp. & Cook 171 (New York Supreme Court, 1874)
Hardeman v. Downer
39 Ga. 425 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1869)
Willitts v. . Waite
25 N.Y. 577 (New York Court of Appeals, 1862)
Donald & Co. v. Hewitt
33 Ala. 534 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
Planters' Bank v. Sharp
47 U.S. 301 (Supreme Court, 1848)
Colt v. O'Callaghan
2 La. Ann. 984 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1847)
Lee v. His Creditors
2 La. Ann. 599 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1847)
Musson v. Lake
45 U.S. 262 (Supreme Court, 1846)
Nelson v. Carland
42 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1843)
Union Bank of Georgetown v. Smith
24 F. Cas. 566 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1830)
Abraham v. Plestoro
3 Wend. 538 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1829)
Ogden v. Saunders
25 U.S. 213 (Supreme Court, 1827)