Bradley v. KCI SHUTTLE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bradley v. KCI SHUTTLE

266 S.W.3d 286, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1191, 2008 WL 4128124

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 2008·No. WD 68960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Bradley appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s dismissal of his application for review of the administrative law judge’s dismissal of his claim for worker’s compensation. After a *287 thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Bradley appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s dismissal of his application for review of the administrative law judge’s dismissal of his claim for worker’s compensation. After a *287 thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Bradley v. KCI SHUTTLE, 266 S.W.3d 286, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1191, 2008 WL 4128124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

266 S.W.3d 286 (Bradley v. KCI SHUTTLE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related