Bradley v. General Counsel

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 2, 2008
• Docket: 08-6437
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6437

GARDNER BRADLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GENERAL COUNSEL, for Central Office, BOP; KIM WHITE, Regional Director; JOE DRIVER, Warden; MR. HOWELL, Executive Staff of USP McCreary, BOP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00112-JPB-JSK)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gardner Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gardner Bradley appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Bradley v. Gen. Counsel, for Cent. Office, BOP, No. 3:07-

cv-00112-JPB-JSK (Mar. 14, 2008). We deny Bradley’s motion for a

preliminary injunction and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -