Bradley v. Gaghan

57 A. 985, 208 Pa. 511, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 797
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 11, 1904·No. Appeals, Nos. 165, 166 and 167·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned referee below found, as facts, first, that these' liens are upon different blocks of houses, separated by public streets; second, that the only item of the materials for which the liens are filed, furnished within six months, was furnished indiscriminately to the three blocks, or if to any one of them separately, it was not shown which; third, that the said item consisted of cement which was used partly or wholly in the construction of sidewalks ; and fourth that the claims were not sufficiently proved. On these facts the judgment was right, and it is affirmed on the referee’s conclusions of law.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley v. Gaghan, 57 A. 985, 208 Pa. 511, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 797 (Pa. 1904).

57 A. 985 (Bradley v. Gaghan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrissey Construction Co. v. Cross Realty Co.
42 Pa. D. & C.2d 533 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1967)
Hamme v. Lockamy
34 Pa. D. & C.2d 462 (Adams County Court of Common Pleas, 1964)
Merritt Lumber Yards, Inc. v. G. E. B. Enterprises, Inc.
22 Pa. D. & C.2d 39 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1960)
Pierce, Butler & Pierce Mfg. Co. v. Rogers
60 Pa. Super. 293 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Sumption v. Rogers
53 Pa. Super. 109 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)