Bradley v. CVS Corp.

328 F. App'x 877
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 27, 2009
DocketNo. 08-2046
StatusPublished

This text of 328 F. App'x 877 (Bradley v. CVS Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. CVS Corp., 328 F. App'x 877 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa Bradley appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss Bradley’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Bradley’s motion to vacate this court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. CVS Corp., No. 8:07-cv-02732-PJM (D.Md. Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 F. App'x 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-cvs-corp-ca4-2009.