Bradley v. County of Delaware
Opinion
“ Justice of the peace and actinig coroner.”
The justice of the peace was a witness, and was asked the question whether the paper produced and certified to as above was the fee bill. Objection was made to the question for the reason that the paper purports to' be a copy, and oral evidence is not allowable to change or contradict it. The objection was overruled, and the witness answered that the paqier was the fee bill, and that it was made a day or two after the inquest was held. We can see no possible objection to the evidence. It was not contradictory of any record or writing. •The witness simply stated in effect that no other fee bill was made, aside from the one then presented. It was but in effect a repetition of what had already been proved, that is, that no docket entry or record was made.
[139] II. The only other question certified to us by the trial judge is whether the fee bill as explained by the evidence was a sufficient allowance, by the acting coroner, against the defendant, upon which to found a judgment. We think, although it was informal, that it was sufficient. It was filed in the auditor’s office, and the item in dispute was submitted to the board of supervisors, and twenty-five dollars was allowed thereon, which plaintiffs refused to accept. The justice testified that he called upon Dr. Bradley to assist at the examination. The' justice of the peace, and acting coroner, had the power and authority to fix the compensation. Cushman v. Washington County, 45 Iowa, 255; Sanford v. Leo County, 49 Id., 148.
Affirmed. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
6 N.W. 175 (Bradley v. County of Delaware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.