Bradley v. Congoleum Nairn, Inc.

92 Pa. Super. 374, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 30
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 21, 1927
DocketAppeal 98
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 92 Pa. Super. 374 (Bradley v. Congoleum Nairn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. Congoleum Nairn, Inc., 92 Pa. Super. 374, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 30 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is a Workmen’s Compensation ease. The accident resulting in the employe’s death occurred at the building in which he worked, and during the usual hours of employment. The appellant insurance carrier contends that the accident did not occur in the course of the deceased’s employment or at a place where his presence was required by the nature of his employment. These contentions are sufficiently answered in the opinion of the learned court below.

The judgment is affirmed o'n the opinion of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matzek v. United Storage & Trucking Co.
186 A. 193 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Sinko v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
159 A. 230 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Adams v. Colonial Colliery Co.
158 A. 183 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Di Marcantonio v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
15 Pa. D. & C. 56 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Tomlinson v. Clarion River P. Co.
96 Pa. Super. 318 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 Pa. Super. 374, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-congoleum-nairn-inc-pasuperct-1927.