Bradley v. Congoleum Nairn, Inc.

92 Pa. Super. 374, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 30
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 21, 1927·No. Appeal 98·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is a Workmen’s Compensation ease. The accident resulting in the employe’s death occurred at the building in which he worked, and during the usual hours of employment. The appellant insurance carrier contends that the accident did not occur in the course of the deceased’s employment or at a place where his presence was required by the nature of his employment. These contentions are sufficiently answered in the opinion of the learned court below.

The judgment is affirmed o'n the opinion of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley v. Congoleum Nairn, Inc., 92 Pa. Super. 374, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 30 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).

92 Pa. Super. 374 (Bradley v. Congoleum Nairn, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matzek v. United Storage & Trucking Co.
186 A. 193 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Sinko v. Bethlehem Steel Co.
159 A. 230 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Adams v. Colonial Colliery Co.
158 A. 183 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Di Marcantonio v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
15 Pa. D. & C. 56 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Tomlinson v. Clarion River P. Co.
96 Pa. Super. 318 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)