Bradley v. City of Atlanta

150 S.E. 435, 40 Ga. App. 499, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 602
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1929
Docket19926
StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E. 435 (Bradley v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. City of Atlanta, 150 S.E. 435, 40 Ga. App. 499, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 602 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta the presiding judge exercises the functions of both judge and jury, and whenever his judgment in a case is authorized by cmy evidence it will not be reversed by the higher courts, unless some error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial. In the instant case the evidence, while in acute conflict, authorized the conviction of the accused by the recorder, no error appears to have been committed upon the trial, and the judge of the superior court properly overruled the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodioorih, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 S.E. 435, 40 Ga. App. 499, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1929.