Bradley v. Bradley

95 A.D.3d 780, 944 N.Y.S.2d 880

This text of 95 A.D.3d 780 (Bradley v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley v. Bradley, 95 A.D.3d 780, 944 N.Y.S.2d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen Gesmer, J.), entered May 6, 2011, which granted plaintiffs motion to direct defendant to pay her $25,000 to enable her to retain counsel in an out-of-state nonmatrimonial action and to pay any subsequent legal fees she incurs therein, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

In a matrimonial action, the court is not authorized to award counsel fees to either party for legal services rendered in a nonmatrimonial action or proceeding, even where the two actions are related (see e.g. Schapiro v Schapiro, 204 AD2d 87 [1994]; Anonymous v Anonymous, 258 AD2d 547 [1999]; Ravel v Ravel, 235 AD2d 410 [1997]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, DeGrasse, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schapiro v. Schapiro
204 A.D.2d 87 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Ravel v. Ravel
235 A.D.2d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 780, 944 N.Y.S.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-bradley-nyappdiv-2012.