Bradley v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bradley v. Bradley

61 A.D.2d 1038, 403 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10702

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 1038 (Bradley v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradley v. Bradley, 61 A.D.2d 1038, 403 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a custody proceeding, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 25, 1977, which, inter alia, dismissed the petition on the merits and continued custody in the father. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for a hearing as to the issue of custody. On the court’s own motion, the proceeding is transferred from the Family Court, Dutchess County, to the Family Court, Suffolk County, and the hearing shall be held in Suffolk County, where the child now resides. This proceeding should not have been determined on the pleadings. On oral argument, the father consented to a reversal and the holding of a hearing on the merits. Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a custody proceeding, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County, dated June 25, 1977, which, inter alia, dismissed the petition on the merits and continued custody in the father. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for a hearing as to the issue of custody. On the court’s own motion, the proceeding is transferred from the Family Court, Dutchess County, to the Family Court, Suffolk County, and the hearing shall be held in Suffolk County, where the child now resides. This proceeding should not have been determined on the pleadings. On oral argument, the father consented to a reversal and the holding of a hearing on the merits. Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 1038, 403 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-v-bradley-nyappdiv-1978.