Bradley v. AAC

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 19, 1997·No. 96-20007·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20007

HARRY E BRADLEY, Estate

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ATLAS AIRCRAFT CORPORATION ET AL

Defendants

HAROLD D HOLDER, SR; HAROLD D HOLDER, JR; FREDERICK W

LLOYD

Defendants-Appellants ____________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA H 93 2708) _________________________________________________________________ February 6, 1997 Before KING, GARWOOD, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendants-appellants Harold D. Holder, Sr., Harold D.

Holder, Jr. and Frederick W. Lloyd appeal the judgment of the

district court awarding plaintiff-appellant Estate of Harry E.

Bradley the amount of $2,382,843.39, together with pre-judgment

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. interest, post-judgment interest and attorney’s fees. We think

that the district court correctly captured the essence of the

transactions at issue here.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley v. AAC, (5th Cir. 1997).

Bradley v. AAC (Bradley v. AAC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.