Bradley Reed Milam v. Kameron Brooke Hughes

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 6, 2022·No. 2022CW0204·Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

BRADLEY REED MILAM NO. 2022 CW 0204

VERSUS

KAMERON BROOKE HUGHES JUNE 6, 2022

In Re: Kameron Brooke Hughes, applying for supervisory writs, 18th Judicial District Court, Parish of West Baton Rouge, No. 1042777.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application failed to include an affidavit verifying the allegations of the writ application

and service, copy of opposition and attachments or statement

advising no opposition was filed, pertinent court minutes, or a

notice of intent and return date order, in violation of Rules 4- 5 ( A) , 4- 5 ( C) ( 9) , ( 10) and ( 11) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. This court is unable to determine whether the writ application is timely.

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an

application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 and 4- 9.

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with

this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, including the missing items noted herein and documentation to show that the original writ application was timely, and must

comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 12. 2. Any new application must be filed on or before June 20, 2022, and must contain a copy of this ruling.

PMC JEW MRT

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

GI• S-v. D

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradley Reed Milam v. Kameron Brooke Hughes, (La. Ct. App. 2022).

Bradley Reed Milam v. Kameron Brooke Hughes (Bradley Reed Milam v. Kameron Brooke Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.