Bradley Hulstein v. David Vaningen
This text of Bradley Hulstein v. David Vaningen (Bradley Hulstein v. David Vaningen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00203-CV ___________________________
BRADLEY HULSTEIN, Appellant
V.
DAVID VANINGEN, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2021-01861-JP
Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On August 30, 2021, we notified appellant Bradley Hulstein that the trial-court
clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed us that he had
not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless Hulstein arranged to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us
with proof of payment within ten days. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because Hulstein has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,
we dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b),
43.2(f).
Hulstein must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: October 7, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bradley Hulstein v. David Vaningen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-hulstein-v-david-vaningen-texapp-2021.