BRADLEY, FRANCES E. v. TOWN OF BOONVILLE ZBA
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
326 CA 11-01600 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF FRANCES S. BRADLEY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
TOWN OF BOONVILLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, RESPONDENT. ------------------------------------------ FORREST C. BARTELOTTE AND MARILYN G. BARTELOTTE, INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
DURR & RILEY, BOONVILLE, PETER M. HOBAICA, LLC, UTICA (GEORGE E. CURTIS OF COUNSEL), FOR INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.
THE AYERS LAW FIRM, PLLC, PALATINE BRIDGE (MEGHAN M. MANION OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered July 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment granted petitioner two variances.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BRADLEY, FRANCES E. v. TOWN OF BOONVILLE ZBA (BRADLEY, FRANCES E. v. TOWN OF BOONVILLE ZBA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.