Bradley, Charlie Louis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 15, 2016
DocketWR-85,153-02
StatusPublished

This text of Bradley, Charlie Louis (Bradley, Charlie Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradley, Charlie Louis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

WR-85,153-02 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/14/2016 5:19:34 PM Accepted 6/15/2016 8:30:01 AM ABEL ACOSTA IN THE CLERK COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 6/15/2016 § ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK EX PARTE § § CAUSE NO. WR-85,153-01 CHARLIE LOUIS BRADLEY § and WR-85,153-02 §

ADVISORY TO THE COURT

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Charlie Louis Bradley files this Advisory To The Court and would show as

follows:

I.

The District Clerk sent the habeas record to this Court before the court reporter

filed the Reporter’s Record for the last day of the hearing even though habeas counsel

had informed the District Clerk that it was incomplete. The court reporter filed the

Reporter’s Record on June 14, 2016. The District Clerk assured habeas counsel that

he will send a Supplemental Record to this Court expeditiously.

II.

This Court’s recent decision Ex parte Saenz, No. WR-80,945-01 (Tex. Crim.

App. April 6, 2016), is dispositive of the primary issue in this case. Applicant contends

that trial counsel performed deficiently in failing to impeach the crime scene officer’s

testimony that she lifted his fingerprints from the inside of the trailer (which contained the stolen property) with her report that she lifted them from the outside of the trailer.

The location of the prints is the pivotal issue in the case, as she acknowledged at the

habeas hearing that it is more incriminating if the prints were found on the inside of

the trailer because prints found on the outside would not necessarily connect that

person to the crime (4 H.R.R. 97-98). Saenz establishes that trial counsel performs

deficiently in failing impeach the key prosecution witness with a prior inconsistent

statement.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Randy Schaffer Randy Schaffer State Bar No. 17724500

1021 Main, Suite 1440 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 951-9555 (713) 951-9854 (facsimile) noguilt@swbell.net

Attorney for Applicant CHARLIE LOUIS BRADLEY

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I served a copy of this document on the prosecutor, Baldwin Chin, by email

on June 14, 2016.

Randy Schaffer Randy Schaffer

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bradley, Charlie Louis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-charlie-louis-texapp-2016.