Bradley, A. v. Anders, D., Judge
This text of Bradley, A. v. Anders, D., Judge (Bradley, A. v. Anders, D., Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
AARON BRADLEY, LK-8658, PRO SE, : No. 96 EM 2022
Petitioner
V.
DANIEL ANDERS, JUDGE, LISETTE HARRIS, PRESIDENT JUDGE, SEAN MACGREGOR, MANAGER, ERIC FEDER, DIRECTOR, DEPUTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondents
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2023, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The
Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bradley, A. v. Anders, D., Judge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradley-a-v-anders-d-judge-pa-2023.