Bradham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bradham v. State

258 S.E.2d 252, 150 Ga. App. 540, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2284

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 3, 1979

Docket56504

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 258 S.E.2d 252 (Bradham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradham v. State, 258 S.E.2d 252, 150 Ga. App. 540, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2284 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Our judgment in Bradham v. State, 148 Ga. App. 89 (250 SE2d 801) has been affirmed in part and reversed in part. Bradham v. State, 243 Ga. 638. In conformity with the decision of the Supreme Court, we find error in that portion of the trial court’s action in denying a challenge for cause. Such error resulted in prejudice when the appellant Bradham was required to use one of her peremptory challenges to excuse that juror, thereby ultimately exhausting all her peremptory strikes prior to the final selection of a qualified jury. The proper selection of the jury constitutes one of the cornerstones of trial by jury. Melson v. Dickson, 63 Ga. 682, 686. Such an error taints the entire trial process and requires reversal of the conviction and sentence.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

Our judgment in Bradham v. State, 148 Ga. App. 89 (250 SE2d 801) has been affirmed in part and reversed in part. Bradham v. State, 243 Ga. 638. In conformity with the decision of the Supreme Court, we find error in that portion of the trial court’s action in denying a challenge for cause. Such error resulted in prejudice when the appellant Bradham was required to use one of her peremptory challenges to excuse that juror, thereby ultimately exhausting all her peremptory strikes prior to the final selection of a qualified jury. The proper selection of the jury constitutes one of the cornerstones of trial by jury. Melson v. Dickson, 63 Ga. 682, 686. Such an error taints the entire trial process and requires reversal of the conviction and sentence.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 S.E.2d 252, 150 Ga. App. 540, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradham-v-state-gactapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack