Bradford Winslow Vose v. State of Florida

186 So. 3d 612, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3127, 2016 WL 805272
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 2016·No. 4D14-971·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant - appeals his convictions of first-degree murder with a firearm and robbery with a firearm. We find the issues raised by appellant to be without merit and therefore affirm. As to. the issue appellant raises regarding jury instructions, we follow this court’s decision in Cruz v. State, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D1172, — So.3d-, 2015 WL 2393281 (Fla. 4th DCA May. 20,-2015), and affirm. As we did in Cruz, we certify, conflict with Floyd v. State, 151 So.3d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 168 So.3d 229 (Fla.2014).

Affirmed.

GROSS, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford Winslow Vose v. State of Florida, 186 So. 3d 612, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3127, 2016 WL 805272 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

186 So. 3d 612 (Bradford Winslow Vose v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anthony Cruz v. State of Florida
189 So. 3d 822 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Floyd v. State
151 So. 3d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)