Bradford, William James

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 10, 2010·No. PD-1423-09·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-1423-09

WILLIAM JAMES BRADFORD, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.



ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3 and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.

En banc

Delivered: February 10, 2010.

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford, William James, (Tex. 2010).

Bradford, William James (Bradford, William James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.