Bradford v. Westbrook

Court of Appeals of Texas

Bradford v. Westbrook

88 S.W. 382, 39 Tex. Civ. App. 638, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 388

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 3, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 88 S.W. 382 (Bradford v. Westbrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradford v. Westbrook, 88 S.W. 382, 39 Tex. Civ. App. 638, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 388 (Tex. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought to enjoin the collection of a tax levied in the year 1902 by the town of Sweet-water for the payment of bonds issued in the year 1898 by the town of Sweetwater when it was a de facto corporation only. This acting corporation was dissolved by decree of court at the instance of the State, in a quo warranto proceeding, in the following year. The .people of the same territory reincorporated in 1902, and assumed to pay the bonds, levying a tax for that purpose.

The petition for injunction, even with the aid of the supplemental petition, did not entitle appellant to any relief whatever. In the first place, neither the town of Sweetwater nor the holder of the bonds sought to be invalidated was made a party to the suit; and in the second place, the facts stated utterly failed to impeach the validity of the bonds. Being issued by a de facto corporation in conformity with the law authorizing a de jure corporation to issue bonds, and being assumed by the succeeding de fure corporation in conformity with the statute authorizing such assumption, the bonds were valid obligations, notwithstanding the town may have had less than 1,000 inhabitants, as alleged, during the life of the de facto corporation. The cases sustaining this view are both numerous and familiar.

The judgment sustaining a general demurrer to the petition is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought to enjoin the collection of a tax levied in the year 1902 by the town of Sweet-water for the payment of bonds issued in the year 1898 by the town of Sweetwater when it was a de facto corporation only. This acting corporation was dissolved by decree of court at the instance of the State, in a quo warranto proceeding, in the following year. The .people of the same territory reincorporated in 1902, and assumed to pay the bonds, levying a tax for that purpose.

The petition for injunction, even with the aid of the supplemental petition, did not entitle appellant to any relief whatever. In the first place, neither the town of Sweetwater nor the holder of the bonds sought to be invalidated was made a party to the suit; and in the second place, the facts stated utterly failed to impeach the validity of the bonds. Being issued by a de facto corporation in conformity with the law authorizing a de jure corporation to issue bonds, and being assumed by the succeeding de fure corporation in conformity with the statute authorizing such assumption, the bonds were valid obligations, notwithstanding the town may have had less than 1,000 inhabitants, as alleged, during the life of the de facto corporation. The cases sustaining this view are both numerous and familiar.

The judgment sustaining a general demurrer to the petition is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 S.W. 382, 39 Tex. Civ. App. 638, 1905 Tex. App. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-westbrook-texapp-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack