Bradford v. United States

152 F. 616, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 19, 1907·No. No. 1,564·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In this case Bradford and Wright were tried together in the Circuit Court and found guilty on certain counts of the indictment. They reserved a bill of exceptions, and sued out a writ of error to this court. The trial judge, Hon. Charles Parlange, annexed to the bill of exceptions an elaborate statement of the case, and of his reasons for his several rulings complained of and to which exceptions were reserved. Those reasons are given in United States v. Bradford et al. (C. C.) 148 Fed. 413, 430. The opinion there reported deals with and decides all the material questions argued at the bar and in the briefs submitted in this court. After careful consideration of the argument and the briefs, we have reached the same conclusions announced by the learned trial judge. We are of opinion, therefore, that there is no reversible error in the record.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. United States, 152 F. 616, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4317 (5th Cir. 1907).

152 F. 616 (Bradford v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyman Hulan Parr v. United States
255 F.2d 86 (Fifth Circuit, 1958)
United States v. Schneiderman
106 F. Supp. 892 (S.D. California, 1952)
United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
53 F. Supp. 889 (District of Columbia, 1943)
Jones v. United States
162 F. 417 (Ninth Circuit, 1908)
Bradford v. United States
152 F. 617 (Fifth Circuit, 1907)