Bradford v. Stone

37 A. 309, 20 R.I. 53, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 44
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedApril 24, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 37 A. 309 (Bradford v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradford v. Stone, 37 A. 309, 20 R.I. 53, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 44 (R.I. 1897).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the testimony shows that it is for the interest of all parties that the partition should be made by sale, rather than by metes and bounds, and that under Gen. Stat. R. I. cap. 265, § 20, we have jurisdiction to order the sale of the right of dower of the respondent Eunice P. Eddy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A. 309, 20 R.I. 53, 1897 R.I. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-stone-ri-1897.