Bradford v. State
216 S.W. 165, 86 Tex. Crim. 229, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 381
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bradford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 Tex. Crim. 122 →
Opinion
This conviction occurred for the illegal manufacture of intoxicants, and is a companion case to Grandberry v. State, No. 5551, and other eases of a like nature from the same county and from the same court, all charging a violation of the same statute. On the authority of the majority opinions in Ex parte Davis, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 168 and Ex parte Fulton, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 149 recently decided, and other opinions of this court in regard to the same matter, this judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradford v. State, 216 S.W. 165, 86 Tex. Crim. 229, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 381 (Tex. 1919).
216 S.W. 165 (Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Davis
215 S.W. 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Ex Parte Furton
215 S.W. 331 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)