Bradford v. State

160 S.W. 681, 72 Tex. Crim. 5, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 549
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 1913
DocketNo. 2731.
StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.W. 681 (Bradford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradford v. State, 160 S.W. 681, 72 Tex. Crim. 5, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 549 (Tex. 1913).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This conviction was for violation of the local option law.

The bills of exception were filed something like 183 days after adjournment of the court, and no reasons assigned why this delay. The statement of facts was filed about 150 days after the adjournment of court, and no reason given why the same was not filed in time. With the record in this condition none of these matters can be entertained ñor considered. In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception there is nothing that this court can revise.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 S.W. 681, 72 Tex. Crim. 5, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.