Bradford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bradford v. State

331 S.W.3d 739, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2011 WL 601610

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 22, 2011

DocketED 94765

StatusPublished

This text of 331 S.W.3d 739 (Bradford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradford v. State, 331 S.W.3d 739, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2011 WL 601610 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Bradford appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *740 judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Bradford appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the *740 judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 S.W.3d 739, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 207, 2011 WL 601610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-state-moctapp-2011.