Bradford v. State

108 S.E. 780, 152 Ga. 203, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 45
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 14, 1921·No. No. 2609·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Eish, C. J.

Under the practice in this State, every motion for a new trial, whether ordinary or extraordinary, must be made during term. An ordinary motion must be made during the term at which the trial was had; and an extraordinary one may be made during a subsequent term. In this case an extraordinary motion for a new trial was made and filed in vacation; the judge heard it on its merits in vacation, and overruled it in vacation. The entire proceeding was nugatory. The judge erred in entertaining jurisdiction of the motion and deciding it upon its merits. According to previous rulings of this court his judgment [204]*204must be reversed, with direction that the motion be dismissed. Perkins v. State, 126 Ga. 578 (55 S. E. 501), and cases cited.

No. 2609. October 14, 1921. This case, on writ of error from the original motion for new-trial, is reported in 151 Ga. 334 (106 S. E. 718).

Judgment reversed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., absent on account of siclcmess.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. State, 108 S.E. 780, 152 Ga. 203, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 45 (Ga. 1921).

108 S.E. 780 (Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graham v. State
170 S.E. 255 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Cray v. State
140 S.E. 402 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Bradford v. State
112 S.E. 893 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)