Bradford v. State

789 So. 2d 1206, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9796, 2001 WL 803645
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bradford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 722 So. 2d 858
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2001·No. No. 4D98-2480·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND

POLEN, C.J.

Charles Bradford, a chiropractor, originally appealed to this court from the denial [1207]*1207of his motion to dismiss the state’s information charging him with unlawful insurance solicitation in violation of section 817.234(8), Florida Statutes (1997). He argued the statute was unconstitutional. We affirmed. Bradford v. State, 740 So.2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Recently, the Florida supreme court disagreed, quashed this court’s opinion, and remanded the cause with instructions that Bradford’s conviction be reversed. State v. Bradford, 787 So.2d 811 (Fla.2001). Following this mandate, we hereby hold that Bradford’s conviction and sentence must be reversed.

REVERSED.

DELL and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. State, 789 So. 2d 1206, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9796, 2001 WL 803645 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 1206 (Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bradford
787 So. 2d 811 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Bradford v. State
740 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)