Bradford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bradford v. State

789 So. 2d 1206, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9796, 2001 WL 803645

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 2001

DocketNo. 4D98-2480

StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 1206 (Bradford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bradford v. State, 789 So. 2d 1206, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9796, 2001 WL 803645 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REMAND

POLEN, C.J.

Charles Bradford, a chiropractor, originally appealed to this court from the denial [1207]*1207of his motion to dismiss the state’s information charging him with unlawful insurance solicitation in violation of section 817.234(8), Florida Statutes (1997). He argued the statute was unconstitutional. We affirmed. Bradford v. State, 740 So.2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Recently, the Florida supreme court disagreed, quashed this court’s opinion, and remanded the cause with instructions that Bradford’s conviction be reversed. State v. Bradford, 787 So.2d 811 (Fla.2001). Following this mandate, we hereby hold that Bradford’s conviction and sentence must be reversed.

REVERSED.

DELL and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI