Bradford v. State
162 So. 922, 26 Ala. App. 622
Opinion
We have read the evidence in this case, and find that the slate has failed to furnish evidence of a guilty scienter on the part of defendant. Defendant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted. Guin v. State, 19 Ala. App. 67, 94 So. 788.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradford v. State, 162 So. 922, 26 Ala. App. 622 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).
162 So. 922 (Bradford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guin v. State
94 So. 788 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)