Bradford v. State
162 So. 922, 26 Ala. App. 622
This text of 162 So. 922 (Bradford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bradford v. State, 162 So. 922, 26 Ala. App. 622 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
We have read the evidence in this case, and find that the slate has failed to furnish evidence of a guilty scienter on the part of defendant. Defendant’s motion for a new trial should have been granted. Guin v. State, 19 Ala. App. 67, 94 So. 788.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Guin v. State
94 So. 788 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 So. 922, 26 Ala. App. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-state-alactapp-1935.