Bradford v. Pruitt

Fourth Circuit

Bradford v. Pruitt

466 F. App'x 168

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 15, 2012·No. No. 11-7179·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steven Karl Edward Bradford appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradford v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-03619WDQ, 2011 WL 3840990 (D.Md. Aug. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Steven Karl Edward Bradford appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradford v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-03619WDQ, 2011 WL 3840990 (D.Md. Aug. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bradford v. Pruitt, 466 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

466 F. App'x 168 (Bradford v. Pruitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related