Bradford v. Lewis

596 So. 2d 1139, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2699, 1992 WL 48706
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1837
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 596 So. 2d 1139 (Bradford v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradford v. Lewis, 596 So. 2d 1139, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2699, 1992 WL 48706 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The appellants claim reversible error in the trial court’s failure to give an instruction on the careless driving statute. We believe the matters set out in that statute were sufficiently covered in the court’s instructions on negligence and causation so as to preclude a finding of any substantial harm. We find no error in the other issues raised on appeal.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur. POLEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harmon v. Williams
596 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 So. 2d 1139, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 2699, 1992 WL 48706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-lewis-fladistctapp-1992.