Bradford v. Jones
Opinion
Richard Bradford, a pro se inmate, commenced this civil action against Steven Jones and Kimberly Jones, alleging malicious prosecution. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Joneses and denied Bradford’s subsequent motion to set aside that summary judgment. Bradford then filed this direct appeal. Held:
Under OCGA § 42-12-8, the discretionary appeal procedures as set forth in OCGA § 5-6-35 are now required in all civil actions filed by prisoners. Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Bradford’s failure to comply with those requisite discretionary procedures deprives this Court of the jurisdiction to consider this case, and the appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
487 S.E.2d 534 (Bradford v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.