Bradford v. Jones

487 S.E.2d 534, 226 Ga. App. 607, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2150, 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 712
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 29, 1997·No. A97A1619·Published

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Richard Bradford, a pro se inmate, commenced this civil action against Steven Jones and Kimberly Jones, alleging malicious prosecution. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Joneses and denied Bradford’s subsequent motion to set aside that summary judgment. Bradford then filed this direct appeal. Held:

Under OCGA § 42-12-8, the discretionary appeal procedures as set forth in OCGA § 5-6-35 are now required in all civil actions filed by prisoners. Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). Bradford’s failure to comply with those requisite discretionary procedures deprives this Court of the jurisdiction to consider this case, and the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Beasley and Smith, JJ., concur. Biederman, Hunter & Morrison, Charles J. Biederman, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. Jones, 487 S.E.2d 534, 226 Ga. App. 607, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2150, 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997).

487 S.E.2d 534 (Bradford v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Townsend
480 S.E.2d 24 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1997)