Bradford v. Division of Employment Security

359 S.W.3d 96, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1400
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2011·No. WD 72837·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Dennis Bradford appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he had been discharged for misconduct connected with his work. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford v. Division of Employment Security, 359 S.W.3d 96, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1400 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

359 S.W.3d 96 (Bradford v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SHURTZ v. State
359 S.W.3d 96 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)