Bradford v. Division of Employment Security
This text of 359 S.W.3d 96 (Bradford v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant Dennis Bradford appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he had been discharged for misconduct connected with his work. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 S.W.3d 96, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2011.