Bradford (Julius) Vs. State (Death Penalty)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JULIUS BRADFORD, No. 80231 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. JAN 2 3 2020 EUT
cLEROFt;M CO BY
DEF,U rt CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying: a motion for return of restitution, a motion for interlocutory decree, a motion for clarification on questions of law, a motion for entry of declaratory judgment, and a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from a district court order denying the above-listed motions, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Al4Csa , J. J.
Stiglich Silver
TO - 0 3 2,21
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Julius Bradford Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT or NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4424. 2 1111.11411Nig Alliff11111111
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradford (Julius) Vs. State (Death Penalty) (Bradford (Julius) Vs. State (Death Penalty)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.