Bradford Eldred & Cuba Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad

1 N.Y.S. 363, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 208, 48 Hun 621, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1341
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 18, 1888·Published

Opinions

Bartlett, J.

I think this judgment should be affirmed unless we are prepared to reverse the previous decision of the general term in this case. 42 Hun, 496. The legality of the contract in question was distinctly upheld by the court on an appeal from an order dismissing the complaint, and I am unable to find anything in the facts which have now been proved upon the trial which ought to change the conclusion reached in that respect, if it was correct. As it is not plain to my mind that the previous decision was erroneous, I am in favor of adhering to it, and therefore vote to affirm the judgment.

Van Brunt, P. J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradford Eldred & Cuba Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad, 1 N.Y.S. 363, 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 208, 48 Hun 621, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1341 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

1 N.Y.S. 363 (Bradford Eldred & Cuba Railroad v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. Ludeling
88 U.S. 616 (Supreme Court, 1874)
Thomas v. Railroad Co.
101 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1880)
Wardell v. Railroad Co.
103 U.S. 651 (Supreme Court, 1881)
Abbott v. Johnstown, Gloversville & Kingsboro Horse Railroad
80 N.Y. 27 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
The Rider Life Raft Co. v. . Roach
97 N.Y. 378 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Arnot v. . Erie Railway Co.
67 N.Y. 315 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
Dutton v. . Willner
52 N.Y. 312 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
Butts v. . Wood
37 N.Y. 317 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Woodruff v. . Erie Railway Company
93 N.Y. 609 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Ten Eyck v. . Craig
62 N.Y. 406 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Fulton v. . Whitney
66 N.Y. 548 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)