Bradfield v. Bradfield

135 A. 777, 100 N.J. Eq. 546, 15 Stock. 546, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 662
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1927·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Poster in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchabd, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlbnnon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. -12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bradfield v. Bradfield, 135 A. 777, 100 N.J. Eq. 546, 15 Stock. 546, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 662 (N.J. 1927).

135 A. 777 (Bradfield v. Bradfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.