Bradfield v. Bradfield
135 A. 777, 100 N.J. Eq. 546, 15 Stock. 546, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 662
This text of 135 A. 777 (Bradfield v. Bradfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bradfield v. Bradfield, 135 A. 777, 100 N.J. Eq. 546, 15 Stock. 546, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 662 (N.J. 1927).
Opinion
The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Poster in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchabd, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlbnnon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. -12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 A. 777, 100 N.J. Eq. 546, 15 Stock. 546, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradfield-v-bradfield-nj-1927.