Bradfield v. . Bradfield

21 S.E.2d 893, 222 N.C. 750, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 126
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 30, 1942
StatusPublished

This text of 21 S.E.2d 893 (Bradfield v. . Bradfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradfield v. . Bradfield, 21 S.E.2d 893, 222 N.C. 750, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 126 (N.C. 1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only exception in the record is to the signing of the judgment. There is sufficient evidence in the record to sustain the findings of fact. The facts as found support the judgment. “The findings of fact made by the Judge of the Superior Court, found as they are upon competent evidence, are conclusive.” In re Hamilton, 182 N. C., 44,108 S. E., 385. Plaintiff’s exception cannot be sustained. The cause remains open for such further orders and decrees as circumstances may require. C. S., 1664.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Hamilton
108 S.E. 385 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E.2d 893, 222 N.C. 750, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradfield-v-bradfield-nc-1942.