Braddum v. Rosenblatt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Braddum v. Rosenblatt

882 S.W.2d 732, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1346, 1994 WL 449732

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 1994·No. No. 65390·Published

Opinion

[733]*733 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the circuit court’s dismissal, for failure to prosecute, of her claim against defendant Rosenblatt. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claim of error to be without merit; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[733]*733 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the circuit court’s dismissal, for failure to prosecute, of her claim against defendant Rosenblatt. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claim of error to be without merit; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Braddum v. Rosenblatt, 882 S.W.2d 732, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1346, 1994 WL 449732 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

882 S.W.2d 732 (Braddum v. Rosenblatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.