Braddon Richard Cooper v. State
This text of Braddon Richard Cooper v. State (Braddon Richard Cooper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00301-CR
Braddon Richard COOPER, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the County Court, Bandera County, Texas Trial Court No. 07-00142 Honorable Richard A. Evans, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 6, 2010
DISMISSED
On April 7, 2010, appellant filed his notice of appeal. The clerk’s record and reporter’s
record were both due on May 24, 2010. On May 21, 2010, the county clerk filed a Notification
of Late Record stating the clerk’s record has not been filed because she has not received payment
for the record. Accordingly, on May 25, 2010, this court ordered appellant to provide written
proof to this court that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to
pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. Our order 04-10-00301-CR
informed appellant that if he failed to respond within the time provided, this cause would be
abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2).
On May 25, 2010, the court reporter filed a Notification of Late Record stating the
reporter’s record has not been filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to
pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without
paying the fee. Accordingly, on June 3, 2010, this court ordered appellant to provide written
proof to this court that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been
made to pay the reporter’s fee or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s
fee. Our order informed appellant that if he failed to provide such proof, appellant’s brief would
be due within thirty (30) days from the date of the order, and this court would only consider
those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a
decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Appellant is represented on appeal by retained counsel
Mr. Thomas Hayes. Mr. Hayes did not file a response to our orders. However, on July 14, 2010,
appellant filed a pro se letter stating he is unable to pay court costs. On July 20, 2010, we abated
the cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing.
Following our abatement to the trial court based upon appellant’s failure to pay for either
the clerk’s record or the reporter’s record, the trial court filed its findings and conclusions. The
trial court found that appellant is not indigent and has at all relevant times been capable of
paying for the records. Accordingly, on August 31, 2010, this court ordered appellant to provide
written proof to this court no later than September 6, 2010 that both the clerk’s fee and the
reporter’s fee have been paid in full. Our order informed appellant that no further extensions
would be granted and that if appellant did not provide such written proof by September 6, 2010,
this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. A copy of this order was served on Mr.
-2- 04-10-00301-CR
Hayes by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by United States mail. A “green card”
indicating a copy of the order was received and signed for was returned to this court on
September 2, 2010. No response has been filed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Braddon Richard Cooper v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braddon-richard-cooper-v-state-texapp-2010.