Bradbury v. Bedbury
16 N.W. 854, 31 Minn. 163, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 38
Opinion
There is only a question of fact in this case, and the evidence would justify a finding of all the facts necessary to sustain the judgment. The facts found justify the judgment, and, if appellant desired a finding on other facts, or a more specific statement of the facts found, lie should have asked the court below to make such finding or statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bradbury v. Bedbury, 16 N.W. 854, 31 Minn. 163, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 38 (Mich. 1883).
16 N.W. 854 (Bradbury v. Bedbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goodwin v. Clover
98 N.W. 322 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1904)
Martin v. Santa Cruz Water Storage Co.
36 P. 36 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1894)
Cummings v. Rogers
30 N.W. 892 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1887)
Leonard v. Green
24 N.W. 915 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)
Hurley v. Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co.
24 N.W. 917 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)
Schulte v. First National Bank
24 N.W. 320 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)
Hewitt v. Blumenkranz
23 N.W. 858 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)